Blog Post by PTAC Member Lori SoskilAbout eight years ago an administrator started a faculty meeting by asking the question, “Why are so many of our students unable to pass the state Keystone exams if their report card grades show them doing well in their classes?” As the chair of the science department, I made this question the driving force behind the discussions at our next few department meetings. What we discovered was that our grading practices included many instances of giving credit for completion of work, participation, and effort. In many cases, this was artificially inflating our grades and ensuring the feedback that we were giving to students and parents was not reflective of what children actually knew about the science content they were supposed to be learning. In other cases, we were using grades to try and coerce children into behaviors that we wanted so our classrooms were more manageable. This was both artificially lowering some students’ grades and negatively impacting the relationships between students and teachers in our classrooms. Instead of having meaningful conversations with students about their actions, we were using grades as a way to modify their behavior. When I reflected on my own personal practices, I saw that I was giving students credit for things that didn’t really help them learn in order to keep their grades high. I thought that I was being compassionate. What I was really doing was taking points from a child who didn’t have a pencil, but had overcome his parents’ addiction that morning to get himself and his siblings to school on time. I was docking a child points for not completing her homework when the previous evening she had spent all night cooking dinner for her family and helping her younger brother with his homework because her parents were still not home from working their jobs in New York City. When children fell asleep in my class, I was taking away participation points instead of recognizing the opportunity to ask my students about the cause of their exhaustion, and whether there was something in their lives with which they needed help. As a department, we made a commitment to revise our grading practice so that report card grades better reflected the knowledge and abilities of our students. In my own classroom that meant abolishing participation points and grades for homework completion, and instituting a remediation policy. Now, in most cases, students can retest in order to demonstrate that they have learned the required material. Currently I have a daughter who is in high school in a different school district. Last year she came home in tears because her grade in a class had dropped significantly. Despite keeping meticulous notes, all required materials, and an organization system that allowed her to have a near perfect average on her tests and quizzes, she had received a low grade on a notebook check that was worth 25% of her overall grade. She asked me, “How is it fair that I know all of the material, can demonstrate that on my tests, but have a lower grade because my notebook wasn’t organized in the way my teacher wanted it to be?” As a teacher and a parent, I had no good answer. Both of us also realized that any grades reported on her upcoming report card would be meaningless in telling us how much of the content in the course she had learned. It also left her with a worse attitude toward the subject of the course, the teacher, and school in general. The grade a student receives should reflect what a student knows or can do in each subject. As teachers, we must realize that the actions we take and the policies we implement impact our students’ emotional well-being, their attitudes toward school, and their motivation to learn. In my classroom I am committed to continually reflecting on how my practices impact my students. Sometimes I’ll get it wrong, as I did in the beginning of my career. But, by putting the needs of my students first, being willing to self-reflect, and learning from other teachers around me, I will continue to grow as a professional. The relationship between teachers and students is the most important thing we can nurture in our classrooms. If we all commit to being reflective and growing as professionals, we can strengthen those relationships and ensure our students succeed in school and in life.
5 Comments
Cindy Ollendyke
2/10/2019 10:12:25 am
Thank you for reinforcing the importance of understanding our students and building those strong relationships with them. Well done Lori!❤️
Reply
Stephen
2/11/2019 06:21:45 pm
Excellent post. Even well meaning teachers need to review their practices. (A 25% Notebook grade, should be reviewed by an administrator.) At the very least, a review of the Notebook rubric with the student should take place and help determine where the student needs to improve.
Reply
2/12/2019 07:49:34 am
Great post Lori. It’s so important to truly evaluate practice (new or established) and evaluate its effectiveness in the final assessment of our students’ mastery of our courses’ material. Today’s teachers have to be unafraid to leave behind those practices as well as refining their understanding of the students who populate their classrooms.
Reply
Colleen Reiner
2/12/2019 08:48:05 am
Well said Lori! In our primary grades, we don't use letters to represent the traditional A,B,C,D,etc. It is more for exceeding our expectations, mastering a skill, proceeding towards a skill, or not progressing adequately. I put number grades on math tests, but I tell parents that this isn't reflected in the report card. I study the test to see if they understand the skills. The report card grade shouldn't reflect the fact that they didn't follow directions, forgot to answer something, or wrote the answer backwards. It should report whether they truly understood the skill/concept or not.
Reply
Steven Weiner
2/14/2019 01:52:33 pm
Lori, I completely understand where you're coming from, and I think your struggles are part of a much larger issue: the practice of letter grade-based assessment. Letter grading is problematic for several reasons. First, any assessment system that forces all student work to be converted into a single point-based economy encourages the kind of confusion you faced. Teachers have incredible empathy and know that grades -- despite intentions for them to solely communicate content mastery-- are interpreted by parents and others as overall class success. Teachers are going to want to "monetize" other dimensions like effort, extenuating circumstances, and persistence, in an attempt to capture and communicate the human complexity of education. Second, even if teachers retool their grading practices to separate out the behavioral/process elements from the "content knowledge", there is a still a larger issue of how one letter can come to represent a student's success in a wide range of competencies. You said, "the grade a student receives should reflect what a student knows or can do in each subject". That seems to be the principle of letter grading, but what does a B actually represent? That a student excelled in one unit, but not another? Or that they made the same small errors in several units? Or that they consistently start each unit of strong, but lack follow-through towards the end? Grades are too abstract and too coarse-grained for students (and parents, for that matter) to connect them with specific strengths and weaknesses within a subject. In the end, students (and parents, for that matter) end up thinking of grades as a personal judgement rather than a snapshot of content mastery (hence the persistent notion of being a "math person", "history person", etc.). Last, grading presents students with a competing goal separate from what teachers intend, namely learning to master and the material. Grades train students to focus on earning points, which as a goal, is far easier to comprehend then "grasp the concepts underlying Newton’s Laws" or "appreciate the complexity of global factors leading up to WWI". Much research has shown that grading makes students dependent on positive extrinsic motivation for sustaining an interest in learning, thus undermining the development of intrinsic passion or interest. If we want students to engage in self-directed learning or exhibit agency over their education, grading has to go. I know this not something any one teacher can tackle. For better or worse, your challenge seems to me to be just the tip of a very large iceberg.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorPennsylvania Teachers Advisory Committee Archives
March 2022
Categories |